Skip to main content

IELTS Cambridge 11 test 1 Writing Task 2

Sample:

It is an accepted fact that a country’s economic improvement relies on its amenities. Without this factor, movement of one product to another, either local or imported, would be a great feat. It is then equally vital that a nation’s government construct either railways or roads or both. This essay will discuss the advantages and drawbacks of both.

Great developed countries like the US, the UK and Japan, to mention a few, are known for their state-of-the-art railway system. These railways provide fast and quality service that benefits both the citizens and their economy. However, for nations that are not blessed with a high GDP and GNP rate, construction of railways can be the least of their priorities. Railroads take up large amount of land and uses a lot of money. Moreover, its construction could last for a much longer time than improving roads. Also, countries that are composed of islands like the Philippines, would find it rather complicated to create a railroad that connects one island to another.

For the developing and third world countries, constructing roads would seem to be more realistic. Almost all countries now have their own highways and streets so the only point to consider is the enhancement of these main streets. Although materials are cheaper than that of railways, one setback to think about is space. Most roads in rural and urban areas are already surrounded by tall skyscrapers and residential areas. Widening these streets in such places can become close to impossible if residents and businessmen would strongly oppose to the government’s plans.


In general therefore, it is proper to mention that railroads and highways are crucial to a country’s improvement and further development. Then again, governments must weigh the pros and cons of each so that they could come up with a better plan on how they would spend money for their constituent’s and economic welfare. 

Word Count: 314

Comments

  1. It good! but It should have some more information in it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is often considered by many that it is better to allocate more budget from government on rail lines than in road infrastructure. I completely agree with the idea because it would promote faster and safer communication and environmentally safe at the same time.
    One of the advantages of increasing rail communication is that it would decrease travel time across the country. As road transportations are the main reasons of congestion and traffic jam, people will find rail roads more convenient in terms of saving time and energy. For instance, the government of Bangladesh will be launching its first ever metro rail across Dhaka city which is designed to reduce road congestion and allow more people to travel to their workplace more conveniently within shorter time. Furthermore, accident rate is higher on road transportation while rail communication is less prone to accidents.
    Railway transportation will have a positive impact on environment in reducing the carbon-dioxide emission. The emission of carbon-dioxide is increasing as people are using cars for daily movements which is leading to air pollution and health hazards. One example of this is Dhaka city which is among one of the cities with the highest air quality index (AQI) score which means higher level of air pollution. People of that city are suffering from This poor air quality is contributing to serious health issues, such as respiratory infections, heart disease, and lung infections, among the population of that citydue to the higher level of pollution. Therefore, spending more money on creating moredeveloping sustainable rail track will be environmentally friendly and save people from life threatening diseases.
    To sum up, I reckon that investment in railway sector instead of road is more beneficial. The government should focus on installing transportation facility which is convenient and safe for people as well as less harmful for the environment in the long-run.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was great 👍. Finally the metro rail is launched in Dhaka.

      Delete
    2. Perfect, I love your answer, because in opinion essay making you stand clear is of paramount importance.

      Delete
    3. It's a good example as he used the real life example that seem to me very much effective

      Delete
  3. It is well written. I like to read it. Blog is very informative and useful. People are facing problems about ielts courses. I think DigitalTraining is a very good and useful website for Ielts Preparation in Lahore
    .

    ReplyDelete
  4. For many pupils, this is a tremendously informative post. In terms of international English language exams, the IELTS is typically regarded as the gold standard. British English is frequently emphasised on this test, which is given by the British Council. Each and every student aspires to pass the IELTS exam on their first try. In your article, you offer a lot of helpful information. A knowledgeable IELTS tutor will provide you all the information you need to easily pass the test.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great insights on the IELTS Cambridge 11 Test 1 Writing Task 2! For those interested in boosting their exam preparation with additional resources, check out pick up mod apk vip/unlocked for enhanced features and access.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This article on IELTS Cambridge 11 Test 1 Writing Task 2 provides great insights! As you refine your writing skills, remember that a true relationship is two imperfect people refusi – tymoff to give up on each other – tymoff—a valuable reminder for collaboration and resilience in your studies.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Tackling IELTS Cambridge 11 Test 1 Writing Task 2 requires a clear structure and strong arguments. Much like the precision and performance of the make1m mclaren senna, crafting a well-organized essay can set you apart. Let’s focus on developing our ideas effectively to achieve the best possible score!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cambridge 11 Test 3 Writing Task 1

Sample: The data from the line graph illustrates the carbon dioxide emissions of an average individual per metric tonnes in four European countries every decade from 1967-2007.A closer look at the data highlights the fact that among the 4 nations, the UK has the highest rate in carbon dioxide emissions per person in 40 years. In 1967, there was approximately 11 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide released by an average Englishman which was about ten times higher than the emissions made by an individual from Portugal. However, it can be seen that as time went by, the carbon dioxide emitted by Englishmen decreased gradually to over 8 metric tonnes in 2007. On the other hand, a different trend can be noted in the countries Italy and Portugal where the emissions slowly rose from an initial rate of approximately 4 and 1 metric ton to about 7 and 6 metric tonnes in 4 decades. In Sweden, emissions increased to its record highest in 1977 w

Cambridge 15: Academic IELTS Writing Test 4: Task 1 (Pie Chart and Table)

The pie chart illustrates the percentage of what Anthropology graduates from one university did after their graduation. The table reveals the earned income they make after 5 years’ work according to three kinds of employment. Overall, in the first graph, most of the graduates worked fulltime after finishing university while the table shows that those who rendered work for 5 years earn a different range in payment in various work sectors.   According to the pie chart, among the six destinations provided, a little over half of the alumni went straight on to working fulltime. Part-time workers garnered the second place with 15%. Surprisingly, the rate of unemployed graduates came in third with 12%. Two sections, full-time postgrad study, and unknown, have the same 8% result while only 5% of the responders said that they work part-time while studying postgrad.   As for salaries, ten and 35 percent of private employees earn from 25 thousand to almost 75 thousand dollars. In contrast, le

Cambridge 11 Test 4 Writing Task 1

Sample: The given data presents the changes in the number of guests and their levels of satisfaction during the pre- and post-renovation period of Ashdown Museum. An overview of the table shows the notable rise in the overall number of visitors who went to the museum after the year of its renovation. While the two pie charts reveal the decline of guests’ dissatisfaction and the surge of their satisfaction. According to the graphs, there was a higher number of people who seem to be unhappy with their trip to the museum during the year before Ashdown museum’s refurbishment. However, these figures changed significantly after the revamping of the building. The dissatisfaction percentage went down to an average of 50 percent. In contrast, guests’ fulfillment climbed up from 30% to 40% (satisfied) and 15% to 35% (very satisfied). Although the results seem to give a positive output both in total guest number and meeting the guests’ ex