Skip to main content

Common mistakes in the IELTS Writing test + easy solution for each

Writing can be intimidating and demotivating. Most people try to shy away from doing writing tasks. However, this should not be the case.

Here's a list of common mistakes seen in writing task outputs.

1. Using the same words from the task topic

Writing an introduction usually takes much time for IELTS test-takers. This is because they are told to paraphrase the topic as their introduction. Many candidates probably have a list of common words used in both the writing task 1 and 2 and the synonyms for each of these words. Due to the overload of vocabulary, or lack thereof, IELTS takers contemplate too much on how they would start. As time passes though panic will overcome their feelings. As a result, they had no other choice but to use the same words from the task topic.

Solution: Change the word forms if you have not enough synonyms. Learn to make use of the other forms of words -noun, adjective, adverb, etc.- you have shortlisted in your vocabulary study. Just remember that it NEVER a good idea to use the same words from the task topic because it will definitely not be included in your word count!

2. Using contractions

A number of students forget that in IELTS, the way we speak should be different from the way we write. That is, speaking is more casual (depending on the situation) while writing is more formal (except in General writing). Also, as a result of poor time-management during the test, examinees rush to finish their output within the given time limit.

Solution: Make it a habit to write the words completely. When writing anything, never use the shortened way of writing words. For instance, instead of writing "It's a must," you ought to write "It IS a must." And another thing to remember, in the test, EVERY WORD COUNTS!

3. Writing assumptions (Task 1) and famous quotations (Task 2)

In task 1, many feel tempted to explain why a certain data had a certain result. That is, they assume why the trend happened on a specific period in time. For example, the graph shows the preference of people eating vegetables in various countries. Some may write that a certain nation may consume more healthy greens over another country because of religious beliefs or other probable reasons.
If the graph does not indicate the word “reasons,” it should NOT be written on your report. This usually happens because examinees need to reach the specified word count for the task. Adding assumption can lengthen the report therefore the word count target can be easily achieved. Never do this!

Solution: Write what you see and not what you feel. Your opinion is not needed in the first task. Have self-control and avoid adding your ideas.

As for the second task, the test takers simply forget that one of the descriptors checked in the test is Lexical Resource, a fancy word for vocabulary range. Adding a famous line or quote said by a popular entity may help explain your point further but it does not show the range of your vocabulary. Evaluators want to see how well we use our learned vocabulary. It might take a lot of creativity and grammar knowledge to do so but it is not impossible.

Solution: Consider paraphrasing the famous quote. Better yet, avoid using them. The trick is to explain your thoughts in the best way you can with the best possible vocabulary you can use.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cambridge 11 Test 3 Writing Task 1

Sample: The data from the line graph illustrates the carbon dioxide emissions of an average individual per metric tonnes in four European countries every decade from 1967-2007.A closer look at the data highlights the fact that among the 4 nations, the UK has the highest rate in carbon dioxide emissions per person in 40 years. In 1967, there was approximately 11 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide released by an average Englishman which was about ten times higher than the emissions made by an individual from Portugal. However, it can be seen that as time went by, the carbon dioxide emitted by Englishmen decreased gradually to over 8 metric tonnes in 2007. On the other hand, a different trend can be noted in the countries Italy and Portugal where the emissions slowly rose from an initial rate of approximately 4 and 1 metric ton to about 7 and 6 metric tonnes in 4 decades. In Sweden, emissions increased to its record highest in 1977 w

Cambridge 15: Academic IELTS Writing Test 2: Task 1 (Line graph)

Sample report:   The line graph depicts the yearly proportion of visitors to a certain island in The Caribbean from 2010 to 2017. In general, the number of guests multiplied in seven years.   In 2010, there were a million travelers who went to the island. This total rose consistently over the years until 2015 and 2016 where it stayed at less than 3 million. However, in the last year, 2017, the number shot up to 3.5 million people.   From the graph, there were more vacationers staying on the island during most of the years. In the first two years, there were fewer than a million guests on the island before slowly increasing to one and a half million in 2013. This rate continued for two more years before declining to 1.3 million then back to its previous sum.   For tourist who vacationed on cruise ships, the line showed a fluctuating trend in the first four years from 0.3 million to 0.5 million people. From 2013, the number gradually grew until it exceeded the number of g

Cambridge 15: Academic IELTS Writing Test 4: Task 1 (Pie Chart and Table)

The pie chart illustrates the percentage of what Anthropology graduates from one university did after their graduation. The table reveals the earned income they make after 5 years’ work according to three kinds of employment. Overall, in the first graph, most of the graduates worked fulltime after finishing university while the table shows that those who rendered work for 5 years earn a different range in payment in various work sectors.   According to the pie chart, among the six destinations provided, a little over half of the alumni went straight on to working fulltime. Part-time workers garnered the second place with 15%. Surprisingly, the rate of unemployed graduates came in third with 12%. Two sections, full-time postgrad study, and unknown, have the same 8% result while only 5% of the responders said that they work part-time while studying postgrad.   As for salaries, ten and 35 percent of private employees earn from 25 thousand to almost 75 thousand dollars. In contrast, le