Skip to main content

Cambridge 13 Academic Writing test 4 Task 2





Sample essay:
The study of History has been recently a subject of debate by most people. Some say that it must be taught in schools while others believe that other subject matters, especially Science and Technology, are more important. This essay will explain a few reasons why both subjects are necessary and why weighing the relevance of either is not considerable.

The goal of most fields now is to make lives easier and better. This is the number one explanation as to why most people say that studying subject matters related to Science and Technology is more fruitful. Politicians, media personalities, and many others have imprinted in the minds of individuals the effect and pleasures of having modern lives. Also, work-related opportunities connected to these fields have enticed many people to choose this career path. As a result, students applying in these fields have been increasing to all new heights. Although true, it does not necessarily conclude that learning History should not be prioritized.

History is still a field that needs more attention. Not many people see the value of it. People view history as studying events, dates, and entities that have long been dead. Moreover, it can be uninteresting at some point. However, it is essential to remember that the past is directly related to the present and to the future. It is fundamental to learn these events that shaped what is now. When it comes to career opportunities, being a history major has a lot of benefits. It is unknown to many, but skills learned by graduates of this field are the most sought after abilities of many recruiters.

Overall, studies that help many understand the causes of events, like History, can give us light as to what actions need to be done in order to change or even avoid the effects. This is where the study of Science and Technology comes in. These fields work hand in hand for the betterment of society.

Word Count: 323













Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cambridge 11 Test 3 Writing Task 1

Sample: The data from the line graph illustrates the carbon dioxide emissions of an average individual per metric tonnes in four European countries every decade from 1967-2007.A closer look at the data highlights the fact that among the 4 nations, the UK has the highest rate in carbon dioxide emissions per person in 40 years. In 1967, there was approximately 11 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide released by an average Englishman which was about ten times higher than the emissions made by an individual from Portugal. However, it can be seen that as time went by, the carbon dioxide emitted by Englishmen decreased gradually to over 8 metric tonnes in 2007. On the other hand, a different trend can be noted in the countries Italy and Portugal where the emissions slowly rose from an initial rate of approximately 4 and 1 metric ton to about 7 and 6 metric tonnes in 4 decades. In Sweden, emissions increased to its record highest in 1977 w...

Cambridge 11 Test 1 Writing Task 1

Sample: The pie charts represent the rate of distribution of water in three different sectors, industrial, agricultural and domestic, in six places worldwide. Generally speaking, the use of water for agriculture has the highest percentage in almost all areas globally whereas water for household use has the lowest ratio. In central Asia, Africa and South East Asia, more than 80% of their water supply is utilized in the production of food which is almost two times larger than in North America that has a greater need in the industrial consumption of water with 48% respectively. Similarly, Europe distributes over half of their water supply in their industries which is far larger than the 5% rate in Central Asia. Water for household use accounts for less than one-fifths in the overall proportion in all six areas in  the world. This data reveals that water is highly used in the production of both food and other commodities than for domestic purposes.  Wo...

Cambridge 15: Academic IELTS Writing Test 4: Task 1 (Pie Chart and Table)

The pie chart illustrates the percentage of what Anthropology graduates from one university did after their graduation. The table reveals the earned income they make after 5 years’ work according to three kinds of employment. Overall, in the first graph, most of the graduates worked fulltime after finishing university while the table shows that those who rendered work for 5 years earn a different range in payment in various work sectors.   According to the pie chart, among the six destinations provided, a little over half of the alumni went straight on to working fulltime. Part-time workers garnered the second place with 15%. Surprisingly, the rate of unemployed graduates came in third with 12%. Two sections, full-time postgrad study, and unknown, have the same 8% result while only 5% of the responders said that they work part-time while studying postgrad.   As for salaries, ten and 35 percent of private employees earn from 25 thousand to almost 75 thousand dollars. In con...